Search results

BRUSSELS, 20th of September, 2012 – Social society activists from Kazakhstan, following the example of the so-called ‘Magnitsky List’, drew up their own list of officials and named it the ‘Zhanaozen List’

The Open Dialogue Foundation hereby expresses its concern over the activity of the CIS-EMO organisation’s mission in Ukraine

The side-event is going to be organised by The Nonviolent Radical Party, Transnational and Transparty and the Open Dialogue Foundation

The side-event is going to be organised by The Nonviolent Radical Party, Transnational and Transparty and the Open Dialogue Foundation

Muammar Gaddafi vs. Nursultan Nazarbayev. What assets will the President of Kazakhstan leave behind?

Monitoring of the pre-election situation in Ukraine (15.08.2012 – 15.09.2012)

After the bloody protests in Zhanaozen, the Kazakh authorities put the oppositionists before the court, accusing them of causing the unrest in the country. The activists may be incarcerated for more over ten years.

Recent events in Aktau highlighted the importance of international monitoring over the trial of the oppositionists in Kazakhstan.

MEPs Marek Migalski and Piotr Borys issued a request in connection with the intensifying situation in Kazakhstan and more violent repression against the opposition leaders.

On the 6th of September, 2012 in the European Parliament Information Office in Warsaw, a briefing was held.

The further course of the trial of the oppositionists: Vladimir Kozlov, Serik Sapargali and Akzhanat Aminov serves to prove the prejudice of the court and the inequality between the prosecution and the defence

On the 6th of September, 2012 in the European Parliament Information Office in Warsaw, a briefing was held.

The biggest political trial in which the accused is the main leader of the ‘Alga!’ opposition party, Vladimir Kozlov, is ongoing in Kazakhstan

In Kazakhstan, the largest political process, in which Vladimir Kozlov, the leader of the main opposition party ‘Alga!’ is principal accused, is ongoing.

Ukrainian human rights activists reported on the systematic violation of the principles of equality and adversity in court, which casts doubt over the justice and validity of the final decision of the court.